home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / alt / feminism / 6755 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-03  |  1.5 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.feminism:6755 alt.abortion.inequity:6255
  2. Newsgroups: alt.feminism,alt.abortion.inequity
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!payner
  4. From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
  5. Subject: Re: Back Again To (Un)Father - NOT!
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan3.194523.2437@netcom.com>
  7. Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
  8. References: <1992Dec30.040142.20381@zooid.guild.org> <1i519hINNk29@gap.caltech.edu>
  9. Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 19:45:23 GMT
  10. Lines: 31
  11.  
  12. In article <1i519hINNk29@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
  13. >Will Steeves <goid@zooid.guild.org> writes:
  14. >
  15. >>peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes...
  16. >>>payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
  17. >>>>Would it be equally OK to for man to make such decisions for women?
  18. >
  19. >>>What equivalent decisions would that be?
  20. >
  21. >>Ah, for instance - The woman doesn't want to raise the child, but the man
  22. >>does.  Is she forced to support a child whom she doesn't want?
  23. >
  24. >If the child is born, then indeed she is!  There *are* cases that have
  25. >mandated a woman to pay child support to a custodial father.
  26.  
  27. And there are cases of meteorites actually hitting people. My understanding
  28. is that they happen about as often. Is this a telling point? Would you
  29. write a letter to your congresscritter demanding meteorite collision
  30. insurance?
  31.  
  32.  
  33. >                                                --  Michal
  34. >----------------------------------------------------------------------
  35. >Of course there's no reason!  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. Rich
  39.  
  40. payner@netcom.com
  41.  
  42.  
  43.