home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!muffy
- From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: Damned Articles
- Date: 29 Dec 92 17:51:15
- Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
- Lines: 27
- Message-ID: <MUFFY.92Dec29175115@remarque.berkeley.edu>
- References: <hjm5uINNgml@agate.berkeley.edu>> <1hkqjdINNj7d@agate.berkeley.edu>
- <725509230@lear.cs.duke.edu> <1992Dec29.201053.8237@panix.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: gcf@panix.com's message of Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:10:53 GMT
-
- In article <1992Dec29.201053.8237@panix.com> gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
- >gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel) writes:
- >| The following article was rejected from soc.feminism. ...
-
- >I think if your articles are going to wear this badge of
- >honor, we ought to have the citation as well. That is, it
- >would seem fair -- and would satisfy our curiosity -- if we
- >could know what reason the moderators gave. Even though what
- >the reason must have been often seems all too obvious.
-
- Oh, Gordon...you're so obtuse. Don't you understand that *any*
- rejection of Hillel's articles, which, of course, are always completely
- relevant, interesting, and non-inflammatory, is further evidence of the
- great feminist conspiracy which has focused on him and real men like him
- in an attempt to shut him up? He, being that real man sort of man,
- cleverly and at great personal risk circumvents this massive effort at
- censoring his worthy ideas by posting them here, despite all the efforts
- (precisely none) of the evil feminists to stop him, thus striking
- another blow for freedom of expression.
-
- Muffy
- --
-
- Muffy Barkocy | ~Can you tell me how much bleeding/it
- muffy@mica.berkeley.edu | takes to fill a word with meaning and/
- "amorous inclinations"? Aha! I'm | how much how much death it takes/to give
- not "not straight," I'm *inclined*.| a slogan breath?~ - Bruce Cockburn
-