home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!rsrodger
- From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
- Subject: Re: Women DOCTORS
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.143408.7165@wam.umd.edu>
- Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rac1.wam.umd.edu
- Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
- References: <92361.095942MIWHC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 14:34:08 GMT
- Lines: 90
-
- In article <92361.095942MIWHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <MIWHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
- > I am looking for any sort of data/statistics on how patients feel about
- >women doctors. As yet, I have found nothing. I get the impression that both
- >older men and women prefer men doctors, middle-aged men prefer men doctors,
- >middle-aged women prefer women doctors and both younger men and younger
- >women prefer women doctors.
-
-
- I think you're going to run into serious problems in attempting
- such a corrolation.
-
- For instance, most kids and teens are saddled with their family
- physician, whoever he or she may be, and their preference is
- unimportant. (Not to mention the large numbers who have no
- choice at all through a first-come-first-serve system like
- Kaiser Permanente)
-
- Further, I think it would be pretty hard to develop a preference
- (a comparative one) when most people see perhaps 4 or 5 different
- doctors in their lifetime--people don't really comparison shop--
- they take the one that's closest, most convenient,or known to
- them.
-
- Finally, I know that your last assertion is false: young men
- prefer male doctors. While they have trepidations about homosexuality
- and another man seeing them unclothed (not to mention--gasp!--
- touching them) they are much more uncomfortable around a female
- doctor.
-
- I suspect that it's the opposite, as well.
-
-
- > These are only impressions I have received from speaking with various
- >women doctors about their patients.
-
-
- Not a really reliable source. To discover patient preferences,
- you have to talk to the patients. But I suspect most of the
- time the answer would be "Hm, I never really thought about it before."
-
-
- >Obviously, the fact that women are finally
- >becoming doctors in much greater numbers must have something to do with this,
- >but I am more interested with the QUALITY of the medical care.
-
-
-
- Quality would vary much more in terms of location (private offive
- vs. mall-like group health association), training (medical school),
- and the doctors competence (or competent demeanor).
-
-
- >It seems that the rate of malpractice suits are lower for women, but
- >again, I need data.
-
-
- It's probably not true, but then again--there are fewer women
- in the really risky occupations (and fewer men all the time as
- well). Lawsuits per person adjusted for the specialization
- would probably debunk this one, while raw-numbers will of course
- be higer for men--not only because of the added risks that
- some men carry due to their specialization, but also because
- there are simply more men.
-
-
- >I also get the impression from speaking with various
- >women dentists, physicians, optometrists and surgeons that women seem to be
- >much more concerned with the patient's fear, comfort, and general well-being,
-
-
- Sounds more like the typical stereotype of women to me. I have
- met nice doctors and mean doctors and techie doctors and goofy
- doctors of both genders (I've seen a lot of doctors--spinal problems)
- and I never noticed a corrolation.
-
-
- >while the male doctors I've spoken with seem to talk more about their
- >technique and various difficult cases. Again, no data.
-
-
- And the typical male stereotype.
-
-
- (not that there isn't some truth to both)
-
- --
- This weakness that you've told us of, it must be very comforting
- to have some make-believe specter on which to lay your blame.
-
- Blaming society for your problems is like blaming clouds for rain.
-