home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13408 alt.alien.visitors:9415
- Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.alien.visitors
- Path: sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti
- From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
- Subject: The Sarfatti Papers 1*
- Message-ID: <BzunBn.A2J@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us
- Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 04:33:22 GMT
- Lines: 117
-
-
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-
- theories,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic
- From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass)
- Subject: Re: Physics: The Good, The Bad, and The Bogus
- Organization: University of Virginia
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 22:43:18 GMT
- Lines: 73
-
- In article <Bzq9Hn.7xx@well.sf.ca.us> sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack
- Sarfatti) writes:
- >
- >"Make my day!" Dirty Harry, Clint Eastwood.
- >
- >Sarfatti replies to:comments between *...*
- >
- >Come to think of it, I remember one or two less than complimentary remarks
- >about one Jack Sarfatti in there...
- >
- >*Maybe so, but at one point referring to my assertion that quantum
- >connection communication is possible, Gardner writes:
- >"I know of no other physicist who thinks it will work. If it does,
- Sarfatti
- >will become one of the greatest physicists of all time." Indeed,
- Gardner's colleague Marcello Truzzi writes of me: (CAPS are not in the
- original Truzzi text)
-
- ..."I am a sociologist concerned with the way the scientific community
- accepts and rejects new theories and data claims and am also the Director
- of the Center for Scientific Anomalies Research. I am particularly familiar
- with Dr. Sarfatti's work because I have been researching a piece contracted
- for OMNI, a science magazine, on the interface between quantum physicists
- (especially those interested in nonlocality and the role of consciousness
- in the measurement process) and parapsychology. Dr. Sarfatti's theories
- have implications for the "paraphysics" research being conducted at SRI
- International, the Mind Science Foundation, the Institute for Advanced
- Studies at Austin, and the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research
- Project. I expect to prominently feature him and his theories in my OMNI
- article.
-
- Since I am not a physicist, I cannot fully evaluate Dr. Sarfatti's
- theories. But certain features of his approach have impressed me. In
- particular, (caps not in original) I ADMIRE THAT HE HAS ALWAYS EMPHASIZED
- THE TESTABILITY AND FALSIFIABILITY OF HIS HYPOTHESES AND URGED THEIR
- SUBMISSION TO EMPIRICAL TESTS. UNLIKE MANY OTHERS WORKING ON RADICAL
- SCIENTIFIC THEORIES, DR. SARFATTI HAS ALWAYS BEEN CLEAR ABOUT WHAT EVIDENCE
- WOULD SHOW THAT HIS IDEAS WERE WRONG AND HAS TRIED VERY HARD TO GET
- EXPERIMENTALISTS TO CONDUCT THE APPROPRIATE TESTS.
-
- Dr. Sarfatti is very much an individualist, but I have always found him
- highly articulate and a warm personality...Obviously he has gone his own
- way (CERTAINLY AN ACADEMICALLY UNCONVENTIONAL PATH) in finding support for
- HIS WORK ON A THEORY WITH EXTRAORDINARY POTENTIAL FOR SCIENCE AND
- TECHNOLOGY. In the process he has attracted the attention of a wide
- spectrum of persons both within the science community AND GOVERNMENT.
- Clearly, he has taken A LARGE RISK IN PURSUING HIS HIGHLY NOVEL, CREATIVE,
- AND CONTROVERSIAL WORK; BUT HE HAS ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD THAT HE IS PLAYING FOR
- VERY LARGE STAKES. If he is right .... the rewards would be immense."
- In the interests of complete coverage, Martin Gardiner says p. 188
-
- For many paraphysicists the EPR paradox suggests that
- quantum information can be transferred instantaneously (or
- almost
- so) from any part of the universe to any other, otherwise
- how does one particle 'know' what happens when its twin
- is measured? (relativity theory is not violated because no
- energy is transferred, only information.) This is the view
- of paraphysicist Jack Sarfatti, who heads a small San Francisco
- organization called The Physics/Consciousness Research Group,
- initially financed by Werner Erhard of est. (Sarfatti and Erhard
- have since had a violent falling out, and Sarfatti is devoting
- much of his time to attacking Erhard as a native 'fascist.')
- For Sarfatti's far-out views see his article 'The physical roots
- of consciousness' in Jeffrey Mislove's wild book, _The Roots of
- Consciousness_ (published by Random House in a fit of absence of
- mind), and an interview with Sarfatti in _Oui_, March 1979.
- Last year (1978 I believe, crb) Sarfatti applied for a patent
- (disclosure number 071165) on a device he hopes can send faster-
- than-light messages to any part of the universe.
-
- In the interests of fairness...
-
- >Martin Gardner also wrote:
- >
- >"Sarfatti is a leading theoretician among U.S. paraphysicists ... he began
- >to have 'odd subliminal experiences' ... He found he could practise
- >'automatic writing' ...and several of his published scientific papers ...
- >were written that way ....Think of the world as an immense, intricate
- >puppet show. Everything has a 'string' attached to it, and the strings are
- >all held by the Great Puppeteer ... its infinite strings provide a
- >connectedness that permits the transfer of information at instantaneous
- >speeds through space and time .... There are no instant signals in the
- >sense that energy is transferred... It is Sarfatti's persuasion that the
- >human mind has natural detectors of deBroglie waves on the quantum
- >molecular level. 'The introduction of this kind of direct quantum
- >information into waking consciousness often appears as paranormal ..."
- >excerpted from Martin Gardner's "Magic and Paraphysics" in Science Good
- Bad and Bogus (1981) before the model now on the WELL and before the book
- by
- >Barrow and Tipler The Anthropic Cosmological Principle.
-
- He also wrote in response to your press release about Uri Geller
- "Note the clear implication in Sarfatti's release that having his
- doctorate in physics made him specially qualified to rule out
- deception". The whole tone of the article is skeptical, and some
- of the things you have stated above are actually quoted in the
- article as your own words, the rest are portrayed as your
- ideas, not Gardner's. I wouldn't say the article is any kind
- of stunning validation.
-
- dale bass
- --
- C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
- Department of Mechanical,
- --MORE--(97%) Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
- PS Bass is evidently a disinformation agent of the Gardner Illuminati - note
- he is not a physicist but an aerospace engineer!
-