home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.abortion.inequity:6257 soc.men:22055 soc.women:22078 talk.abortion:53968 alt.feminism:6761
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
- From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
- Newsgroups: alt.abortion.inequity,soc.men,soc.women,talk.abortion,alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: Reproductive Technologies... (was: Re: Father Notification...)
- Date: 3 Jan 1993 23:25:40 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 22
- Message-ID: <1i7slkINN7h9@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <C05KMD.34L@ddsw1.mcs.com> <1993Jan1.161916.5572@panix.com> <C08KKH.I1o@ddsw1.mcs.com> <1993Jan2.210817.10907@panix.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu
-
- gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
-
- >However, what I was thinking of was this: insisting that
- >49% of custody go to men may run into the question of
- >whether 49% of the men _want_ custody. Considering the
- >implacable resistance to paying child support shown here
- >and elsewhere, I have the idea that a good many men might
- >not consider your proposal a boon if the luck of the draw
- >smiled upon them. Take care: you may be giving ideas to
- >the devious witches on NOW's General Staff for yet
- >another plot.
-
- Deviousness aside. Gordon, it assumes that the percentage
- wanting custody among men and women is equal, although not
- specifying the percentages. I have no idea whether that
- assumption is valid. Can anyone out there quote a study?
-
- --
-
- -- Michal
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Of course there's no reason!
-