home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.abortion.inequity:6148 soc.men:21716 alt.feminism:6453
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!censor!isgtec!robert
- From: robert@isgtec.com (Robert Osborne)
- Newsgroups: alt.abortion.inequity,soc.men,alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: What's really behind this "men's choice" thing?
- Message-ID: <3908@isgtec.isgtec.com>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 17:55:31 GMT
- References: <1992Dec19.185647.15769@rotag.mi.org>
- Sender: news@isgtec.com
- Followup-To: alt.abortion.inequity,soc.men,alt.feminism
- Lines: 24
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
-
- Kevin Darcy (kevin@rotag.mi.org) wrote:
- : robert@informix.com (Robert Coleman) writes:
- : > The woman creates the baby. She has the choice, and she is, in
- : >fact, the only person who *can* create a baby.
-
- : Have you been listening to Steven Kellmeyer, Robert? This specious reasoning
- : sounds _awfully_ familiar...
-
- : REFUTATION
-
- : The man's action (participating in coitus sex) is part of the causal chain
- : leading to the creation of the child, therefore there is a _prima facie_
- : legal case for holding him at least partly responsible for the support of that
- : child.
-
- Speaking of specious reasoning...
-
- Using this argument the all of the grandparents are also legally
- responsible: their action (participating in coitus sex) is part of the
- causal chain leading to the creation of the grandchild.
-
- Rob.
- --
- Robert A. Osborne ...!uunet.ca!isgtec!robert or robert@isgtec.com
-