home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!sgi!fido!solntze.wpd.sgi.com!livesey
- From: livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey)
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
- Subject: Re: lost skills of the ancients (was pyramids)
- Date: 12 Dec 1992 00:09:31 GMT
- Organization: sgi
- Lines: 18
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1gbajrINNhvf@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- References: <ByqtIB.IBB@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> <1992Dec8.213729.978@walter.bellcore.com> <Bz4A67.E71.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: solntze.wpd.sgi.com
-
- In article <Bz4A67.E71.2@cs.cmu.edu>, lindsay+@cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay) writes:
- |>
- |> kenl@origami.cc.bellcore.com (Ken Lehner) writes:
- |> >Perhaps only slightly less mundane, but we can't reproduce the violin-making
- |> >process of Amati, Stradivari, and Guarneri, only a couple of hundred years
- |> >ago, which they used to create instruments superior to anything made today.
- |>
- |> I've heard claims that the classic violins have improved with age,
- |> and even a claim that the improvement was due to being played well.
- |> Obviously, modern replicas would have trouble on this point.
-
- Along similar lines, the varnish used on old masters changes slowly
- with time, and when it's cleaned off and replaced, we hear howls
- of outrage. The current notion of artistic excellence seems
- to be conditioned by whatever the current state is of works of art
- traditionally thought to be excellent.
-
- jon.
-