home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Roger.Firestone@f349.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Roger Firestone)
- Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
- Path: sparky!uunet!blkcat!Uucp
- Newsgroups: sci.research
- Subject: Japanese Economic War (?)
- Message-ID: <724417278.AA00000@blkcat.UUCP>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:24:00 -0500
- Lines: 117
-
- RS> I'm afraid I fail to see the relevance of this argument.
- RS> The
- RS> Japanese are not engaging in unfair practices by keeping all
- RS> U.S.
- RS> (and other 'foreign') companies out of their markets because
- RS> the CIA
- RS> overestimated the KGB years ago? Come on!
-
- I'm pointing out the similarity of the reasoning processes, not adducing an
- argument about the Japanese from the CIA/KGB fallacy. You need more practice on
- reading comprehension... (You started the sarcasm [or flaming] here.)
-
- RS> While I believe in a free market (as long as it is open to
- RS> all)
- RS> as well as free government, I fail to see how transferring
- RS> the
- RS> wealth of the U.S. to Japan at an incredible rate counts as
- RS> our
- RS> system "having the laws of mathematics on its side." That
- RS> transfer
- RS> is in fact taking place at a rate that by the year 2000
- RS> Japan will
- RS> surpass the U.S. and become the wealthiest country on the
- RS> Earth.
-
- Your figures are considerably out of date. The Japanese are having lots of
- problems with "wealth transfer," in fact. I recall an article about someone who
- was selling them land in a rice-growing area of the South a few years back.
- When he was criticized for selling the "national wealth" of the United States to
- foreigners, he pointed out that he had been buying and selling land in the area
- for thirty years and the Japanese were right off the boat. "Which of us do you
- think knows what he is doing?" he said. Well, the Japanese bought an awful lot
- of American land at the top of the market a few years ago and are having plenty
- of losses, both paper and realized, with a lot of tax money flowing to the US to
- keep their assets afloat. (Incidentally, the largest foreign ownership share of
- US assets is British, not Japanese. Wonder why we aren't worried about them?
- After all, they're a monarchy with a more pervasive feudal system and an active
- left-wing party...)
-
- RS> Ahh, the classic argument! "I have the evidence, but don't
- RS> feel
- RS> like posting it!" Most often this is used only as a last
- RS> resort by
- RS> someone who does not have a complete grasp of the topic on
- RS> which
- RS> they argue.
-
- More flamage. I refer you to any number of books by Milton Friedman, Ludwig von
- Mises, Friedrich Hayek, along with dozens of articles from the Wall St. Journal,
- Reason magazine, and publications by the Cato Institute, among loads of others.
- There is plenty of evidence on the side of classical Austrian economics; I just
- don't plan to take up everyone's time and the net's bandwidth in posting it here
- when there are plenty of public libraries for people to read it in.
-
- RS> While I agree that the Japanese system is faulty in that it
- RS> damages
- RS> the world economy, I fail to see how an economic plan for
- RS> the next
- RS> 200 years (which Japan reportedly has) can be credited only
- RS> with
- RS> "short-term success."
-
- I'm afraid I must be incredulous of a "200-year plan." What plan invented in
- 1792 could possibly have envisioned the developments of the past twenty decades
- in the industrial world. The steam engine barely existed, there were no
- railroads, no automobiles, no theory of electromagnetism, no knowledge of the
- atom, barely any chemistry, not even steel as a construction material--
- engineering was done with wood and masonry and rock. I guess you could say that
- that most visionary of Americans, Thomas Jefferson, had a 200-year plan: Give
- the people freedom and a limited government and trust to their good sense and
- ingenuity. I don't think anything that the Japanese can dream up for their
- 200-year plan, other than some way to impose two centuries of stagnation on the
- world, could possibly deal with the unimaginable developments of the next two
- hundred years of the history of mankind.
-
- RS> I sincerely hope that Americans will soon wake up to the
- RS> economic
- RS> threat from Japan in time to alter our laws in such a way as
- RS> to
- RS> become a mirror of their trade laws and thereby force them
- RS> to make
- RS> their policies fair. Hopefully, they will one day
-
- So we are to defeat the Japanese by becoming just like them? Sounds more like
- surrendering to their world view to me. In a world without free trade, everyone
- will become poorer. Consult the works of David Ricardo on comparative advantage
- for further details the relevant economic theory.
-
- RS> discontinue their
- RS> economic offensive and fully participate in free
- RS> *multi*lateral
- RS> world trade, which will be to the benefit of all. Until
- RS> that day,
- RS> however, we must learn to look after ourselves and not
- RS> naively
- RS> depend on the benevolence of others.
-
- Funny, I thought that is what I was arguing for--looking after ourselves in the
- traditional individualistic American way.
-
- Just one further comment: The reason that Japan cannot become an effective
- democracy until it changes its ways (or will change its ways as soon as it does
- become a true democracy) is that the mass of Japanese consumers are paying for
- the success of a few giant corporations and their managers. As the original
- posting pointed out, prices are kept high in the home market, middle class
- Japanese live far more poorly than do comparable Americans, and the half of the
- Japanese population without a Y chromosome are almost completely shut out of any
- form of self-realization in their system. To the extent that the US pressures
- Japan, we give them an external bogeyman to blame for their problems. A
- free-trade policy by the US will leave that argument unsupported; we just have
- to sit back and wait for the inevitable upheaval from within. It already
- happened in the former Soviet Union with the defense race of the early to
- mid-80's; free trade is our most potent weapon against the managed traders of
- the world.
-
- Roger.Firestone@f349.n109.z1.fidonet.org
-
-