home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu!abian
- From: abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
- Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA. VERIFIABILITY CARRIED TO RIDICULE IN GR AND QM
- Message-ID: <abian.724289079@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Summary: DO NOT PUSH VERIFIABILITY TO RIDICULOUS LIMITS
- Keywords: TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS IS CARRIED TO CREDULITY IN GR AND QM
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:24:39 GMT
- Lines: 96
-
- 12-13-92
-
- To the readers of TIME HAS INERTIA and
- (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4)
-
-
- A major reason of some readers' ruthless dismissal of my (A1), (A2),
- (A3), (A4) is that according to them, my assertions are not scientifically
- verified and that they are pure delirious hallucinations since my asser-
- tions are not tested and confirmed in laboratories.
-
- Of course the "guardians of Physics and Truth" in their own similar situa-
- ation, refer to their assertions as "thought experiment", "gedanken exper-
- iment". Obviously, this is not a hypocrisy it is a matter of scientific nomen-
- clature!!
-
- What is so appalling is that "the guardians of Physics and Truth" push
- the verifiability to the most ridiculous limits in their everyday twisting and
- twirling of their principles to explain the occurrence of unexpected pheno-
- mena in their laboratories and in the Cosmos.
-
- They frantically resist to admit (A1),(A2) and especially (A3) and
- resist toaccept that particles, as well as planets, as well as people,
- as well as galaxies are governed in all of their actions by the most
- powerful, and primal principle (A3), i.e., "GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY".
-
- Here is a typical example of how "guardians of Physics and Truth" push
- the notion of VERIFIABILITY to sottish and fatuous limits, especially
- when dealing with particle physics.
-
- It was experimentally observed and verified that when a certain
- rooster R crowed in the morning, the sun rose.
-
-
- The experiment was repeated for a whole week and it did not fail
- a single day.
-
- The experimentalist E said that there is a good experimental indi-
- cation that the Rooster's crow rises the sun.
-
- A colleague C challenges E. The colleague C says "I do not
- agree with your experimental conclusion. I will prove you wrong.
- I will kill the rooster R and you will see that the sun will still
- rise".
-
- C kills the rooster, cleans it up and puts it in the refrigerator.
-
- Next day there is no crow of the rooster R but sun rose again,
-
- Then C tells E, "you see the crow of the rooster was not the reason
- for the rise of the sun - there was no crow but the sun rose again"
-
- E (twists and twirls) and says "Oh, no . The vocal cords of the
- dead rooster R in the refrigerator did vibrate this morning how-
- ever with an inaudible frequency - and so again, the crow of the
- rooster R was the reason for the sun to rise".
-
- C says, "I will eat the neck of the rooster R. There will be
- no vocal cords and you will see that the sun will still rise"
-
- C eats the neck of the rooster R and gives the rest of R to
- the neighbors.
-
- Next day, there is no neck of R and no R itself in the refrigerator.
- But the sun did rise again.
-
- C confronts E again.
-
- E (twists and twirls) and says " the molecules of the vocal cords of
- the rooster R which are in your intestines, they did vibrate this
- morning. Thus it was indeed again the crow of the rooster R which
- rose the sun this morning.
-
- E, triumphantly says to R " that's it the experiment verified that the
- crow of the rooster R rises the sun everyday".
-
- Similar experimental conclusions are made everyday. So, do not dismiss
- my assertions (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4) on the ground of experimentabil-
- ity.
-
- Trust me, accept (A1) to (A4), I am sure that they will pass the
- genuine test of the experimental verifiability.
-
-
- With love, Alexander Abian
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --
- The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
- The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.
- TIME HAS INERTIA and some energy is lost to move Time forward
- E = mcc (Einstein) must be replaced by E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)
-