home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:17209 sci.physics:21463
- Path: sparky!uunet!mtnmath!paul
- From: paul@mtnmath.UUCP (Paul Budnik)
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Bayes' theorem and QM
- Message-ID: <442@mtnmath.UUCP>
- Date: 19 Dec 92 16:30:30 GMT
- References: <1992Dec18.134107.24536@oracorp.com>
- Followup-To: sci.math
- Organization: Mountain Math Software, P. O. Box 2124, Saratoga. CA 95070
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <1992Dec18.134107.24536@oracorp.com>, daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough) writes:
- > [...] Bell's Theorem
- > shows that there is no deterministic completion of QM that uses
- > classical probability theory. [...]
-
- It only shows that there is no *local* deterministic completion of QM.
- A nonlocal deterministic theory would be quite strange and I do not think
- it is a likely possibility, but it is certainly a logical possibility.
-
- Paul Budnik
-