home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16930 rec.puzzles:7922
- Newsgroups: sci.math,rec.puzzles
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: Marilyn Vos Savant's error?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.055832.26324@galois.mit.edu>
- Keywords: savant
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <1gj5grINNk05@crcnis1.unl.edu> <1992Dec15.012404.24027@galois.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 05:58:32 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- I wrote:
-
- 1) You draw 4 cards from a well-shuffled standard deck. You turn one
- over and it's an ace. What's the probability that they are all aces?
-
- 2) You draw 4 cards from a well-shuffled standard deck. You turn one
- over and it's the ace of hearts. What's the probability that they are
- all aces?
-
- The answers to problems 1) and 2) are NOT THE SAME.
- ---
-
- On second thought I would like to reword this problem. It's a subtle
- difference but I think that in dealing with these tricky probability
- paradoxes it's important to be precise. So, instead:
-
- 1) You draw 4 cards from a well-shuffled standard deck. Given that one
- is an ace, what's the probability that they are all aces?
-
- 2) You draw 4 cards from a well-shuffled standard deck. Given that
- one is the ace of hearts, what's the probability that they are
- all aces?
-
- The answers to problems 1) and 2) are NOT THE SAME.
-