home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16804 sci.physics:21033 sci.bio:4547 sci.chem:5377 misc.education:5206
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.bio,sci.chem,misc.education
- Path: sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - NewScientist Article
- Message-ID: <1992Dec13.195740.10476@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <abian.723244875@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> <klclauss.4.723351158@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 19:57:40 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick) writes:
-
- >I just read got this weeks New Scientist. In the Feedback
- >section on the second last page they mention this TIME
- >HAS INERTIA thing on the Internet but also mention
- >there is now a scale called the CRACKPOT INDEX.
- >
- >i.e. - you get 40 points for claiming a revolutionary
- >theory that gives no concrete testable predictions, etc etc
- >
- >It also mentions spoof messages that people are writing
- >spoof? articles to get
- >the maximum possible points in the Crackpot INDEX.
-
- Do they mention that I invented the crackpot index? Probably not. Yet
- another brilliant idea of mine leading to no tangible fame. :-)
- Maybe I should write a letter to the editor.
-
- Anyway, in answer to your question, most of the crackpot index stuff
- appeared on sci.physics, and all of the postings are apparently archived
- somewhere. I don't know where and couldn't care in the least, since for
- the most part the idea of archiving newsgroups is like tape-recording
- all the conversations in an insane asylum.
-
- I'll send you the official crackpot index.
-