home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16784 sci.physics:20998 sci.bio:4540 sci.chem:5363 misc.education:5182
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.bio,sci.chem,misc.education
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu!abian
- From: abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - BASS JEALOUS AND INSECURE-ABIAN VALIDATED
- Message-ID: <abian.724200923@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- References: <abian.723244875@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> <klclauss.4.723351158@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au> <1992Dec12.195654.7419@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
-
- 12-12-92
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 22:55:23 GMT
- Lines: 101
-
- FLAGRANT MANIFESTATION OF JEALOUSY AND INSECURITY BY C.R. BASS
- PATHETIC METHODS FOR GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY. BASS PROVES (A3)
-
- In <1992Dec12.195654.7419@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick) writes:
-
- >>
- >>I just read this weeks New Scientist. In the Feedback
- >>section on the second last page they mention this TIME
- >>HAS INERTIA thing on the Internet but also mention
- >>there is now a scale called the CRACKPOT INDEX.
-
- > Just what we need, validation for Abian. Why couldn't
- > the mention have appeared in the American Journal of
- > Psychiatry?
-
- > Of course, that would probably have been validation too.
- > C.R.Bass
-
- TIME HAS INERTIA is validated - C.R. Bass is discredited as a
- jealous, putting down envious person who gets his feeling of security
- by most pathetic means of eminating arrows of hate, sarcasm, enmity,
- hostility and antipathy.
-
- He is jealous that despite all his desperate attempts to sabotage
- the spread of my revolutionary innovative ideas , dspite all his
- deliberate obstraction to postings in TIME HAS INERTIA he did not
- succeed to stop people's interest and appreciation of (A1), (A2, (A3)
- and (A4). In fact, they are growing to his dismay!
-
- Nevermind the article in NEW SCIENTIST, I was told that
- in France and Germany there are conferences studying TIME HAS INERTIA
- topic and that THEY ARE MORE AND MORE CONVINCED THAT in all those
- cases where there is a PUSZZLING LOSS OF ENERGY - ABIAN's (A2) IS
- THE NSWER:
-
- (A2) TIME HAS INERTIA (i.e. TIME IS MATTER) AND SOME ENERGY IS
- IRRETRIEVABLY DISSIPATEED TO MOVE TIME FORWARD
-
- AND NONE OF THE existing theories is capable to explain the puzzling
- loss of energy and that (A2) revolutionized both GR and QM.
-
- BASS, why don't you broadcast to the entire Europe and in fact to the
- entire globe to discard my TIME HAS INERTIA based on nonverifiability,
- nonpredictability and nonquantifiability of my ideas. Do it, save the
- decadent status quo of "Scientific verifiability, predictability and
- quantifiability". Save the neanderthalish precambrian mentality that
- matter does not act in such a way as to gain a feeling of security.
- Why don't you ridicule this too (which will again, according to (A3)
- prove that you like to knock people down to gain a feeling of security)
-
- In fact, to prove my ideas, I need your type of persons - you are
- a best experimental verification of that
-
- (A3) GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY
-
- is the basic, fundamental Physical Law motivating the actions of everything -
- of particles, of electrons of SPACE of galaxies of people ( of their
- jealousies, their fanaticism, their sarcasm,t heir envy of not being "The
- FIrst", etc., etc).
-
- The sooner Science and Physics accepts (A3) the sooner they will
- progress from their blind status quo maintaining decadent mentality
- (which undoubtedly gives them a feeling of security - although false)
- and gain a more powerful, correct and truthful feeling of security
-
- I am trying to put the science on the correct foundation - that gives
- me a feeling of security.
-
- DO NOT ASK what is the Definition of "SECURITY" - nothing can define it
- -it is the basic, the fundamentally elemental term
-
- IT IS THE LIFE ITSELF, IT IS THE SCIENCE, THE PHYSICS ITSELF
-
- (and the above is not a Definition of SECURITY -it is just a vague subconscious
- description).
-
- With love Alexandrer Abian
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --
- The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
- The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.
- TIME HAS INERTIA and some energy is lost to move Time forward
- E = mcc (Einstein) must be replaced by E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)
-