home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:5805 alt.security.pgp:250
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght
- From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight)
- Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
- Message-ID: <1992Dec17.220742.3339@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Dec16.173333.12868@netcom.com> <mgmXVB16w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:07:42 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
-
- When mathew asks where he can get his free copy of RSAREF I fear he
- is being both misleading and disingenuous.
-
- He doesn't need one in Europe, as he well knows--RSA's patents don't
- apply there and there's no ethical issue if the RSA algorithm is
- programmed from scratch there.
-
- He can't get RSAREF since it falls under the Munitions Act.
-
- As for ripem itself, there's no reason one can't reprogram it
- in Europe, to avoid export issues, and then there'd be a
- compatible and legal version in both the U.S. and outside--
- Voila! A "universally usable scheme" which everyone can feel
- ethical about using.
-
- The reverse isn't true for PGP since it is, by definition, currently
- a violation in the U.S. even if reprogrammed from scratch.
-
- The way around that, of course, would be for someone in the U.S.
- to reprogram it using RSAREF. I understand a team is working on that.
-
- If that is successful, then there'd also be a universal set of PGP
- versions. I know it's inconvenient to have two versions, and some
- might even think it silly (I do not), but it would be ethical.
-
- Ethics is hard, sometimes, but trust me--it's worth it.
-
- David
-
-