home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!linac!att!att!dptg!ulysses!ulysses!smb
- From: smb@research.att.com (Steven Bellovin)
- Subject: Re: Spies using PGP
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.143221.26055@ulysses.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 14:32:21 GMT
- References: <1992Dec10.064145.21209@fasttech.com> <hmiller.724028396@lucpul.it.luc.edu> <1992Dec14.054304.1311@fasttech.com>
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Dec14.054304.1311@fasttech.com>, zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk) writes:
- > I'm not really a student of bureaucracy but I'll suggest that Not Invented
- > Here would be a bigger obstacle keeping an agency from adopting PGP than any
- > weaknesses in it.
-
- Nope. With something like a cryptosystem, the very fact that it's wide-
- spread makes it undesirable for really sensitive messages. PGP, if
- widespread -- and for that matter, DES right now -- are important targets
- for NSA et al. simply because they could recover a lot of traffic given
- a general solution methodology.
-
- > There is a general consensus that real spooks disparage the
- > use of factoring based cryptosystems
-
- Realy? From everything I've heard, the opposite is true, especially if
- the numbers are large enough.
-