home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!scott
- From: scott@psy.uwa.oz.au (Scott Fisher)
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Subject: Re: CD players revisited - Luxman vs. Marantz
- Date: 16 Dec 1992 02:18:53 GMT
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- Lines: 29
- Message-ID: <1gm3mdINNcko@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
- References: <1992Dec07.222629.10579@eng.umd.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: wapsy.psy.uwa.oz.au
-
- >Hello netters,
-
- >I have noticed that when it comes to CD players (<$400)
- >very few people seem to mention Luxman DZ121. Is it just
- >a coincidence or are there so many better cd-players in this
- >range? The reason I'm asking is because a local store is now
- >offering it for $300, and I figured it might be a good deal
- >(it's not a display or used model).
-
- For some reason (like Luxman is not that widespread in the US) Luxman
- rately rates a mention in this group at all. That said Luxman make a
- fine range of equipment, that depending on the countary you live in
- can compete with the best of them in value-for-dollar terms. All Luxman
- gear I have seen (quite a lot) has been well made and sounded as good
- as anybody else. Here in Australia I think Rotel is better value for
- money...sounds just as good and is cheaper (on average). Luxman does
- seem to be very well made.
-
- Regards Scott.
- _______________________________________________________________________________
- Scott Fisher [scott@psy.uwa.oz.au] PH: Aus [61] Perth (09) Local (380 3272).
- _--_|\ N
- Department of Psychology / \ W + E
- University of Western Australia. Perth [32S, 116E]--> *_.--._/ S
- Nedlands, 6009. PERTH, W.A. v
-
- Joy is a Jaguar XJ6 with a flat battery, a blown oil seal and an unsympathetic
- wife, 9km outside of a small remote town, 3:15am on a cold wet winters morning.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-