home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!eco.twg.com!NewsWatcher!user
- From: brambo@eco.twg.com (Mark Bramblett)
- Subject: Re: Opinion on M&K sub
- Message-ID: <brambo-151292164307@143.172.48.212>
- Followup-To: rec.audio
- Sender: news@eco.twg.com (News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eco.twg.com
- Organization: The Wollongong Group (East Coast Operations)
- References: <0f=BXAq00Uh7M400xu@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Dec15.163700.7465@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 21:39:16 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Dec15.163700.7465@bmerh85.bnr.ca>, stud1b53@bnr.ca (Anshu
- Prasad) wrote:
- >
- > In article <0f=BXAq00Uh7M400xu@andrew.cmu.edu>, Bambang Suryanto <bs3f+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
- > |> Anybody has comment on M&K sub espessially the MX-70? Good or bad?
- > |> Anyone ever try to connect it with DR-7?
- > |>
- >
- > I think M&K subs are fantastic. For the money I think they sound
- > (and feel) much better than comparably priced Velodynes. The MX-70 is
- > the one I've tentatively picked to go with the Def Tech BP-10's (in
- > a home theater application). I'm going to have to audition it in my
- > sound room before I make the final decision. I think the MX-70's dual
- > 8" drivers in push-pull configuration outperform even M&K's 12" single
- > driver systems. It should sound just as good with the DR-7's (which are
- > pretty much the unipolar equivalents of the BP-10's).
- >
-
- I have a follow-on question to use of the MK subwoofer and Definitives.
- I just purchased 4 BP-20s and 2 C-1's to go into a surround sound
- arrangment
- and I have more bass than I can deal with (...grin!). Do you really feel
- you need a subwoofer as well?
-
-
- Mark Bramblett
-
- VMS Program Mgr
- The Wollongong Group
-
- brambo@eco.twg.com
-