home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sgi!fido!zola!rmr
- From: rmr@sgi.com (Robert M. Reimann)
- Subject: Re: support for the arts in the US
- Message-ID: <th0o1ss@zola.esd.sgi.com>
- Sender: news@zola.esd.sgi.com (Net News)
- Organization: Technical Publications, Silicon Graphics, Inc.
- References: <1g5p0cINNjf4@agate.berkeley.edu> <tdamkf8@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1gc1toINNq96@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 19:37:38 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes:
- >rmr@sgi.com (Robert M. Reimann) writes:
-
- >You appear to think of art as a "public good." A public good is any
- >good whose benefits cannot be restricted to those who pay for it.
- >National defense, for example, is a public good.
- >
- >But what I don't see is how art, or literature in specific, is
- >such a good. After all, to my stubbornly myopic view of things,
- >it seems that restricting the reading of books to those who pay
- >for them is perfectly good disqualification from this exalted
- >status.
-
- So you are against libraries, then?
-
- >Because let's not forget what we're doing when we subsidize
- >literature. I might be able to support it but I will brook no
- >euphemisms in the process. What we are doing is forcing people to
- >buy books that they do not want to read; and before you do this
- >you had better have a pretty damn good reason.
-
- See it's a question of access. It's not just a demand
- side problem, either. For a society that places free
- expression at the top of its priority list (or the Bill 'o
- Rights at any case), we can expect the individuals of
- that society to make a small sacrifice (and it's damn
- small) to ensure that this right is upheld for everyone.
-
- Robert.
-