home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-coco!nwnexus!remote!UUCP
- From: Kurt.Ullman@f290.n231.z1.fidonet.org (Kurt Ullman)
- Newsgroups: misc.emerg-services
- Subject: Phoograpers On Scene.
- Message-ID: <724281948.AA26311@remote.halcyon.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 09:18:01 -0800
- Sender: UUCP@remote.halcyon.com
- Lines: 30
-
- SS>KU> And most likely written by some reporter who was ticked off
- SS>KU>because they would not let himon the scene as opposed to a REAL
- reporter
- SS>KU>who waited until later and got the story.
-
- SS>How in the world we got this far off tangent is beyond me. The
- original
- SS>thread dealt with photogs on the scene, not reporters. There is
- very
- SS>little, minimal in fact, information a reporter can garner during
- the
- SS>actual management stage of the incident. Some background
- information,
- SS>perhaps, but nothing really important.
-
- Now that you mention it... I think reporters sorta became the
- generic term when TV and their standups joined the ruckus awhile a go.
-
-
-
- SS>KU> And my J-school Profs. STILL asked why I got out of the
- SS>KU> business.
-
- SS>Couldn't stand rejection, huh? (Grinning as he says this in a VERY
- SS>joking way.)
-
- Actually it was the type of people I was accepted by (grin).
- * Origin: The RoadHouse BBS <ASP> 1-317-784-2147 (v.32bis)
- (1:231/290.0)
-
-