home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!mucs!lucs!news.csc!bruce
- From: bruce@uxb.liv.ac.uk (Bruce Stephens)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Subject: Re: Concerns about the FSF and the GNU project
- Message-ID: <BRUCE.92Dec16151502@suprenum.uxb.liv.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 15:20:36 GMT
- References: <1992Dec7.032601.4662@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <Bz22pL.GEz@mtholyoke.edu>
- <DREIER.92Dec10121615@phnom-penh.berkeley.edu>
- <Bz4pvD.545@mtholyoke.edu>
- Sender: news@compsci.liverpool.ac.uk (News Eater)
- Organization: Centre for Mathematical Software Research, Univ. Liverpool, UK
- Lines: 13
- Nntp-Posting-Host: supr.scm.liv.ac.uk
-
- >>>>> On 12 Dec 92 04:30:49 GMT, jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz) said:
-
- > Well, I understand your point of view, but I believe that you are
- > misguided. There /is/ protection for your livelihood, in the form
- > of source-code copyrights, which I believe (and apparently so does
- > the LPF) is appropriate and adequate.
-
- I think it's more accurate to say that the LPF is not concerned with
- source-code copyrights, and so has no position on them.
- --
- Bruce CMSR, University of Liverpool
- Use PGP 2.1; make private email private!
- Key fingerprint = E0 2E 17 55 56 C6 14 D2 03 E4 18 D7 A4 5B 86 20
-