home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!clarkson!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!udel!sbcs.sunysb.edu!hanche
- From: hanche@ams.sunysb.edu (Harald Hanche-Olsen)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Subject: What is what in the GNUniverse?
- Message-ID: <HANCHE.92Dec16172632@ptolemy.ams.sunysb.edu>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 22:26:32 GMT
- Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster)
- Distribution: gnu
- Organization: University at Stony Brook, NY
- Lines: 30
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ptolemy.ams.sunysb.edu
-
- FTPing to prep.ai.mit.edu I find in the pub/gnu directory about 88
- packages (=programs, libraries and program collections). This is all
- very impressive, and must represent countless hours of good work by
- innumerable volunteers. A lot of the stuff there I already use, and
- there might be lots more that could be useful to me. However,
-
- (setq whine-mode t)
-
- with fancy names like ae, bison, elvis, hello (hello!? did someone
- write "Hello world" in 105591 bytes (compressed)? I hope not!), and
- so on, it is not always clear what these things do. Out of 88 or so
- packages I find I recognize the use of about 2/3 of them -- I imagine
- that makes me a very well informed person indeed?
-
- The only way I see to get information about a GNU package is to
- download it, or ask in this forum. Both are a massive waste of
- bandwidth (and my time) if it turns out I am not interested after all.
-
- So why isn't there a nice, clean README file there, containing a short
- little description of each package, that I can download and study at
- my leisure? It would cost so little, and be so useful. If each
- author of GNU software was required to provide such a description (max
- 10 lines, say) then a coordinator could produce the required file in
- no time at all.
-
- (setq whine-mode nil)
-
- Thank you for your attention.
-
- - Harald
-