home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!hilbert!tommy
- From: tommy@hilbert.att.com (Tom Reingold)
- Subject: Re: select function
- Reply-To: tommy@boole.att.com
- Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ, USA
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:32:47 GMT
- Message-ID: <tommy.724433567@hilbert>
- References: <34398@adm.brl.mil> <1992Dec11.163537.513@gamelan>
- Sender: news@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (NetNews Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hilbert.l1135.nj.att.com
- Lines: 17
-
- thf@zelator.in-berlin.de (Thomas Funke) writes:
-
- $ In article <34398@adm.brl.mil> jbowyer%ovc.vutbr.cs@csbrmu11.bitnet (Jeff
- $ Bowyer) writes:
- $ > I am trying to compile a program under Interactive UNIX (on some
- $ > machine that I seldom use). However, the program includes a call to
- $ > the select() function, which is not present in our Interactive UNIX
- $ > installation. What should I use instead of the select() function?
-
- $ Is this true ? I believe you cannot call something "UNIX" if there is no
- $ select().
-
- What do you call versions of UNIX that preceded 4.2 BSD?
- --
- Tom Reingold
- AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
- tommy@boole.att.com or att!boole!tommy
-