home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com!klaus
- From: klaus@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Todd Klaus)
- Subject: Re: UNIX: Acronym?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec16.220646.20353@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com>
- Organization: Honeywell Air Transport Systems Division
- References: <1992Dec4.104915.7303@gmd.de> <1992Dec4.193328.7888@cdf.toronto.edu> <1992Dec15.091834.1112@infoware.co.za>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 22:06:46 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- >This sounds to me like an attempt to put words to an acronym, not vice-versa.
- >as I understand it, UNIX is a contraction of UNICS which was a play on MULTICS,
- >the operating system which Ritchie and Thompson were working on together before
- >Unix. MULTICS stood for something like "Multiplexed Timesharing Control System"
- >and was an attempt at an interactive multi-user OS which failed because the
- >project was too large, time dragged on and the backers pulled out. Ritchie and
- >Thompson decided to write their own operating system for a "spare" PDP-8 which
- ^^^^^
- Shouldn't this be PDP-7? (the famous "little-used PDP-7 sitting in a corner")
- later to be ported to the PDP-11/20 with the whopping 512k hard drive...
-
- >was lying around at Bell labs. Since they were incorporating some of the
- >concepts they had been working on for the Multics project, they called it
- >"UNICS". This was later shortened to "Unix".
-
-
- --
- This is a sample sig file!
-
-