home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
- From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: Dumb Question: Why 512 byte block?
- Date: 19 Dec 92 15:31:19
- Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <CGD.92Dec19153119@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
- References: <1992Dec18.030833.7395@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1gt736INNjje@menudo.uh.edu>
- <1992Dec18.235623.27538@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1gvv8gINN80e@menudo.uh.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: wjin@cs.uh.edu's message of 19 Dec 1992 20:04:32 GMT
-
- In article <1gvv8gINN80e@menudo.uh.edu> wjin@cs.uh.edu (W. Woody Jin) writes:
- >BTW, could anyone clarify whether 386BSD uses the Fast Unix File System
- >which is described in "A Fast File System For Unix" by McKusick, Joy, Leffler,
- >and Fabry (1984 ACM Tran. on Computer System) ?
-
- yes, it does. this is the stuff you see in /sys/ufs (but excluding
- /sys/ufs/mfs* -- the _old_ mfs (memory filesystem) stuff)...
-
- random fun: the mfs in 386bsd cares about disk layout... <chuckle>
-
- cgd
- --
- Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
-
- "Sometimes it is better to have twenty million instructions by
- Friday than twenty million instructions per second." -- Wes Clark
-