home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!uw-beaver!newsfeed.rice.edu!nb.rockwell.com!quayle@switch.rockwell.com
- From: quayle@switch.rockwell.com (Bill Quayle)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc
- Subject: Re: New SPARCcenter?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec20.032503.18659@nb.rockwell.com>
- Date: 20 Dec 92 03:25:03 GMT
- Article-I.D.: nb.1992Dec20.032503.18659
- References: <BzDs10.DEI@qualis.com> <1992Dec18.193812.10803@nb.rockwell.com> <16018@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
- Sender: news@nb.rockwell.com
- Reply-To: quayle@switch.rockwell.com
- Organization: Switching Systems Division - Rockwell International
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <16018@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
- |> >SS10-M41 1way 1263
- |> >Sclassic Server 1way 4539
- |>
- |> ...
- |>
- |> >For specifics, please refer to the above-mentioned white paper.
- |>
- |> I'll have to - I'm curious why a measly Tsunami-based SPARCclassic
- |> Server gets a higher SPECrate_int92 than a mighty Viking-based
- |> SS10/41....
-
- Sorry, Guy, that should be:
-
- SS10-M41 1way 1263
- Sclassic Server 1way 626
-
- -Bill
-