home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.sun.misc:5809 comp.org.sug:512
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!sun-barr!male.EBay.Sun.COM!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!appserv.Eng.Sun.COM!appserv!khb
- From: khb@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM (Keith Bierman fpgoup)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.org.sug
- Subject: Re: NSE findings
- Date: 11 Dec 92 12:54:16
- Organization: SunPro
- Lines: 33
- Message-ID: <KHB.92Dec11125416@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM>
- References: <1992Nov24.004921.5353@BofA.com> <1992Dec11.015515.4587@thirdi.uucp>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: chiba
- In-reply-to: greg@thirdi.uucp's message of 11 Dec 92 01:55:15 GMT
-
-
- In article <1992Dec11.015515.4587@thirdi.uucp> greg@thirdi.uucp (Greg Holmberg) writes:
-
- Here are a few more you might want to try:
- ....
-
- Also SPARCworks/Teamware from SunPro. Your local SMCC sales folks
- ought to have literature soon (the press announcement already has
- occured).
-
- The most obvious difference between these products is in their
- philosophy. TeamNet and ClearCase go for "transparency", that is they
- let you work from your shell pretty much as you always have, with
- makefiles. They do this by implementing their own Unix file system
- (read: you have to rebuild your kernel). This is an attempt to
-
- Having done this sort of thing in the past (NSE) we chose not to do
- that this time ;> Using Teamware is a lot like using SCCS; but extra
- functionality is added (but nothing taken away, we merrily have folks
- using both on the same project).
-
- I am not an expert in Teamware; however I can arrange to pass follows
- to those who are.
-
- cheers
-
-
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
- Keith H. Bierman keith.bierman@Sun.COM| khb@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM
- SunPro 2550 Garcia MTV 12-40 | (415 336 2648) fax 964 0946
- Mountain View, CA 94043 <speaking for myself, not Sun*> Copyright 1992
-
-