home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.sun.hardware:6316 comp.sys.sun.admin:9528
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.admin
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!caen!destroyer!gumby!wmu-coyote!john
- From: john@sol.cs.wmich.edu (John Kapenga)
- Subject: Re: How well do Sun 3/60s work as color X terminals?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec17.054001.1613@sol.cs.wmich.edu>
- Organization: Western Michigan Univ. Comp. Sci. Dept.
- References: <BzB6Gw.9An@well.sf.ca.us> <smith.724473709@phylo> <1gmihuINNshd@wintermute.phys.psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:40:01 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1gmihuINNshd@wintermute.phys.psu.edu>, kenh@leps5.phys.psu.edu (Ken Hornstein) writes:
- > In article <smith.724473709@phylo> smith@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Steven Smith) writes:
- > > We use them with Xkernel and they work just fine. Performance is identical
- > >(as far as I can tell) to an SS1 running Openwindows.
- >
- > Ugh, that bad, eh? (half :-) )
- >
- > --Ken
- It appears to me using a new gcc and X11R5, the 3/60 are a lot faster
- then the SS1s
- john
-
- --
- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- John A. Kapenga Department of Computer Science
- Ma Bell: (616)387-5657 Western Michigan University
- Internet: john@cs.wmich.edu Kalamazoo, MI 49008
-