home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrew
- From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern)
- Subject: Re: Adobe Photoshop: Port that suckah' over!
- Message-ID: <1992Dec16.212342.19530@cubetech.com>
- Organization: Cube Technologies, Inc.
- References: <1992Dec13.205727.20660@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec14.213524.6350@cubetech.com> <1992Dec15.220409.28619@athena.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:23:42 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1992Dec15.220409.28619@athena.mit.edu> zmonster@athena.mit.edu (Eric M Hermanson) writes:
- >>In article <1992Dec13.205727.20660@fcom.cc.utah.edu> yf5990@u.cc.utah.edu (Yan Fang/Humanities) writes:
- >>>In article <1992Dec11.212746.1895@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com writes:
- >>>>In article <1992Dec10.141950.9223@chromagrafx.com> msb@chromagrafx.com writes:
- >>>>>after they buy Image. When I saw it at Seybold they had most of the features
- >>>>>of Photoshop but were greatly lacking in speed and it seemed that it crawled
- >>>>>when making changes to the image.
- >>>>
- >>>>The new beta of Image is significantly faster than the previous ones.
- >>>
- >>>The new beta of Image is fast and highly Photoshop competitive, feature
- >>>for feature as well as performance-wise. When Image hits the streets this
- >>>thread may never again surface--it's really that good. Just don't try to
- >>>edit CMYK images on a 16MB color slab--RGBA screams, however.
- >>
- >
- >When is RETOUCHE supposed to be released? I heard it will have retouching
- >features comparable to a $500,000 SCITEX machine.
-
- Well, so does photoshop, it's just not going to be quite as fast as,
- say a Scitex Blaze on a NSTC.
-
-
- andrew
- --
- andrew@cubetech.com | "C++'s runtime sucks shit! Virtual functions
- Andrew Loewenstern | can go straight to hell!" - Ron Pomeroy
- Cube Technologies, Inc. | ForYourEyesOnly public key:
- 0000000701B61D1ADF0DFC9C16185CEA055200000007EB4A9FEB1922065D471A89E905B5
-