home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.misc:20881 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:16007 misc.invest:15165
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,misc.invest
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!mv!siia!drd
- From: drd@siia.mv.com (David Dick)
- Subject: Re: History was made today...
- Message-ID: <1992Dec19.000643.979@siia.mv.com>
- Organization: Software Innovations, Inc.
- References: <1gon7oINNshk@mirror.digex.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 00:06:43 GMT
- Lines: 67
-
- In <1gon7oINNshk@mirror.digex.com> hacker@access.digex.com (Dark Hacker) writes:
-
- >History was made today. IBM's stock price dropped to below its book
- >value of 55 today, to close at 51 points per share on news that Big
- >Blue would be shedding another 25,000 workers and cutting their
- >dividend. On the very same day, Apple Computer stock closed at 55
- >points per share, 4 points higher than that of Big Blue.
-
- Relative share price is really quite irrelevant; compare price/earnings
- or percent over book, or...
-
- >When the Apple Macintosh was first introduced, IBM derided this computer
- >as "a toy" claiming that mice were too difficult for users to comprehend
- >and use. They laughed at the little toaster of a machine: "The business
- >world will never accept it." "No one could use this for any serious
- >commercial development."
-
- IBM thumbing its nose at Apple is not the point; some of its problems
- stem from the fact that it followed Apple into the personal computer
- market.
-
- >But who's laughing now? IBM is on the skids and scrambling to stay
- >alive. Apple Computer is experiencing record sales and revenues
- >thanks to their new Powerbook computers.
-
- I would hardly say IBM is "scrambling"; it just no longer has the
- enormous success it's had since the mid-sixties, when it bet the
- company on a brand new way of building computers (a whole series
- capable of running roughly the same software).
-
- >Innovation and attention to the customer in the form of ergonomic design
- >and well engineered products are what distinguish Apple's computers from
- >the utter crap being churned out by IBM and the PC clone manufacturers.
- >No longer able to rely on consistant sales of big mainframes to huge
- >institutions, IBM is suddenly finding it has to (gasp) compete and, if
- >it learns its lesson at all, will have learned it too late.
-
- Don't forget that IBM: made personal computers possible by inventing
- floppy disks and "Winchester" hard disks (just about the only kind anyone
- uses), and redefined the personal computer by making a relatively open
- design that allowed an explosion of independent hardware and software
- suppliers.
-
- The duplication of their PC design made it difficult for them to make
- money selling their PC, but led directly to the current plunge of PC
- prices. How many Macintosh cloners are there? Didn't Apple buy
- a company named Cadmus that had produced a Mac-like interface on
- a UNIX workstation?
-
- >Ignore the market... and the market will ignore you...
-
- But IBM has not ignored the market -- it's following one trend that
- Apple is decidedly not following: open systems.
-
- Remember Sculley said that no one ever made money selling
- non-proprietary systems.
-
- I think the lesson of comparing the current fortunes IBM and Apple
- may well be that it's hard to make money selling open systems, but
- it's easier to make money selling proprietary systems.
-
- I'm not trying to be an IBM fan, but explaining the financial results
- of the two companies is not simple "good guys/bad guys".
-
- David Dick
- Software Innovations, Inc.
- [the Software Moving Company; converting software to UNIX for over a decade]
-