home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!rei2!fox
- From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
- Subject: Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. : ( help....
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:29:02 GMT
- References: <Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.
- Lines: 15
-
- mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas) writes:
-
- > I don't think Stacker itself is unstable...either the 1.x or 2.0 or 3.0
- >versions, in so much as the comation of Stacker + some operating systems +
- >some drivers + some motherboards is unstable. In other words, it no more
- >unstable than any other program.
-
- My experience seems to indicate that Stacker is as (un)stable as the
- person using it.
-
- --
- #ifdef TRUE | Fuzzy Fox (a.k.a. David DeSimone) fuzzy@netcom.com
- #define TRUE 0 |
- #define FALSE 1 | "You have been recruited by the Star League to defend
- #endif | the Frontier against Xur and the Kodan Armada."
-