home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #30 / NN_1992_30.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 32912 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-12  |  965 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!wisdom.bubble.org!sugra!ken
  2. From: ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  4. Subject: Re: AMD rubbish????
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec12.032716.16273@sugra.uucp>
  6. Date: 12 Dec 92 03:27:16 GMT
  7. References: <1992Dec8.093121.89@roads.sa.gov.au:
  8. Organization: Private Computer, Totowa, NJ
  9. Lines: 12
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Dec8.093121.89@roads.sa.gov.au: wilsonn@roads.sa.gov.au writes:
  12. :I'm thinking of buying a PC, either a AMD386DX40 or an Intel 486SX25 - 33. I've
  13. :been told that the AMD chip is unreliable and would appreciate some feedback.
  14. :Comments on relative speed between the machines also would be helpful. 
  15.  
  16. If the AMD chip did not perform completely like an Intel, you would see Intel
  17. plastering that all over their advertisements.
  18.  
  19. -- 
  20. Kenneth Ng
  21. Please reply to ken@eies2.njit.edu for now.
  22. Apple and AT&T lawsuits: Just say NO!
  23.