home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!uchinews!kimbark!coonstot
- From: coonstot@kimbark.uchicago.edu (charles orville onstott)
- Subject: Re: Copywrong and copyright (was: Good Bye Atari)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.235350.2996@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: coonstot@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <3_800_842_fidonet2b28d6ba@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:53:50 GMT
- Lines: 62
-
- In article <3_800_842_fidonet2b28d6ba@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> michael.smith@f842.n800.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (michael smith) writes:
- >Original to: dmb@xbar.ai.mit.edu
-
- >
- >This is a 'leading wordprocessor that everyone on the atari would love to
- >have.' Not.
-
- I would love to have it--bugs and all.
-
- >
- >As usual, too much time was spent making them look 'pretty' so that
- >brainless salespeople could sell it to brainless executives and the like,
- >and not enough making them _work_.
-
- Actually, you do realize that Word and Word Perfect are the most
- frequently purchased word processors on the market, right? And I
- guess that if they really *were* that buggy, ie that EVERYONE had
- such problems, we are all just stupid enough to continue to purchase
- it, right? In reality, these programs don't crash that often,
- for example my WP for Atari ST, which everyone seems to hate, works
- just fine, rarely do I have any trouble(twice a year, maybe?) and
- when I do the auto backup feature covers me everytime. Not only
- that, but I can take the files I make with WPST and copy them
- to a disk and load them on the IBM lab downstairs allowing me
- to use a laser printer--something I can't afford and given the
- fact that the university doesn't use Atari in their labs, I'm
- quite thankful. I am a liberal arts graduate student which renders
- me to use this software almost perpetually and given the fact
- that I have used the same version for the last 4 years and
- have been able to churn out paper after paper on it, I have no
- complaints. The spell check works fine, the thesaurus is great,
- its editing features are lovely, it's fast and above all, once
- one is familiar with WP commands, it's easy to use.
-
- The problem you have fallen into is that you assume that the
- program should be perfect and this is a fantasy. No program has
- ever been perfect, not one of that caliber. Nor have I
- been entirely satisfied with any of the other "best" word processors
- for the ST--which, btw, are buggy themselves. These programs,
- Word and Word Perfect, get the extensive use they get because they
- are easy to use and are basically bug free. Unless you happen
- to think that most people happen to enjoy using buggy software
- and don't mind the fact that "every time" they load Word
- they will run out of memory? The fact is this rarely happens
- and when it does, it's frustrating. But that's the price we
- pay when we turn our lives over to computers--hell, this happens
- with typewriters as well, that they breakdown.
-
- >
- > d> Dave Baggett
- >
- >\`miff` /|\
- >
- >--- ScanMail 0.68 X0501
- > * Origin: That Which Is Not, ST in SA. 61-8-232-5722 (3:800/842)
-
-
- --
- Charles O. Onstott, III (coonstot@midway.uchicago.edu)
- Graduate Student in Religion and the Human Sciences
- The University of Chicago Divinity School
- "For [the study of] history, too, has its fashions." (Anouilh)
-