home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:17635 comp.sys.amiga.misc:18887
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!kowari.cpsg.com.au!bohra.cpg.oz.au!fisherc
- From: fisherc@bohra.cpg.oz.au (Craig Fisher)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: SAS C6.1 datecmp bug [Was: Re: Advice to SAS/C 5.10b users]
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.030843.16107@bohra.cpg.oz.au>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 03:08:43 GMT
- References: <BzD93n.JCo@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <BzEqDF.A5H@unx.sas.com>
- Organization: Computer Power Software
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <@unx.sas.com> walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker) writes:
- > In article <>, shulick@shoshone.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick) writes:
- > |> It would be rather safe to stick with 5.10b. 6.0 and 6.1 are too
- > |> buggy.. But you can probably see that from all the posts(complaints) on
- > |> c.s.a.p. :)
- >
- > I don't agree at all. In anything the size of SAS/C, there are going
- > to be bugs. I believe the majority of V6 customers are not experiencing
- > major problems - you just hear about the ones that are on the net
- > because they are reporting them.
-
- Seems to me thought that you could have used a few more beta testers.
- The number of bugs in this release doesn't really seem reasonable or
- excusable to me.
-
- > 6.1 fixes most of the problems reported in 6.0, except of course that
- > we broke the MATH=68881 option. If you don't use that particular
-
- What about the problem with the datecmp() function? I reported this
- as broken via emits, but have not received any response (other than
- a receipt acknowledgement). Can you confirm that it is broken? Has it
- been fixed? Any idea when the next patch will be ready?
-
- Regards,
- --
- =======================================================
- | Craig Fisher \ P.O. Box 686 |
- | fisherc@bohra.cpsg.com.au \ Woden, ACT 2606 |
- | "Keep Yourself Alive" - Queen \ Canberra, Australia |
-