home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!seunet!pop!bjst
- From: bjst@sth.frontec.se (Bjorn Stenberg)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: SAS6.1 users: please read
- Message-ID: <1992Dec12.003520.16086@sth.frontec.se>
- Date: 12 Dec 92 00:35:20 GMT
- References: <92337.012542MLO@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <ByMz9y.J0H@fc.hp.com> <2b238567@bcstarc.stgt.sub.org> <Bz41v7.4sp@unx.sas.com>
- Organization: IDK/Frontec - System Design Group
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pop.sth.frontec.se
-
- root@bcstarc.stgt.sub.org (Frank Pecher) writes:
- > |> And I'd expect the compiler to give an unsigned/signed conflict
- > |> warning. I tried to get something like that after compiling your example
- > |> with STRICT and ANSI options but got no warning.
-
- walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker) writes:
- > I believe you would find that this warning would come out a lot more
- > than you think. I don't think it would be particularly useful due to
- > this.
-
- I agree. An option to activate the warning would be nice, though.
- Like a PICKY mode for use when STRICT isn't enough. :-)
-
- -- Bjorn
-
-
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bjorn Stenberg, Stockholm, Sweden bjst@sth.frontec.se
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-