home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:18698 comp.sys.mac.misc:20765 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:15912
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!jkatz
- From: jkatz@netcom.com (Joseph Katz)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.atari.st.misc
- Subject: Re: WANTED: Your comments on Supra modems
- Message-ID: <1992Dec17.100545.10851@netcom.com>
- Date: 17 Dec 92 10:05:45 GMT
- References: <7151@sersun1.essex.ac.uk> <1992Dec16.232239.581@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <1992Dec17.084755.22036@u.washington.edu>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Dec17.084755.22036@u.washington.edu> hhll@stein.u.washington.edu (Steven Hodas) writes:
- >dtiberio@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu (David Tiberio) writes:
- >
- >> I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND SUPRA MODEMS - IN MY OPINION THEY ARE NOT RELIABLE
- >
- >I really, really like my Supra v.32bis. I had no trouble setting it up,
- >it's fast as hell, the faxes are great, the software is great, the price
- >is great, the display is great, the manual is great, and the company has a
- >terrific ROM upgrade policy.
- >
- >I WOULD RECOMMEND SUPRA MODEMS UNRESERVEDLY-I HAVE HAD FEWER PROBLEMS WITH
- >IT (0, TO BE EXACT) THAN ANY OF MY FRIENDS HAVE HAD WITH OTHER HIGH SPEED
- >MODEMS.
-