home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!gumby!wmu-coyote!22black
- From: 22black@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Martin Black)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: 1024 x 768
- Message-ID: <1992Dec20.182414.6050@sol.cs.wmich.edu>
- Date: 20 Dec 92 18:24:14 GMT
- References: <38070@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1992Dec19.163147.4996@ida.liu.se> <1992Dec19.232757.9165@ida.liu.se>
- Organization: Western Michigan Univ. Comp. Sci. Dept.
- Lines: 31
-
- y88kenek@odalix.ida.liu.se (Kenneth Ekman) writes:
-
- >First: No, I don't usually comment on my own articles...
-
-
- >y88kenek@odalix.ida.liu.se (Kenneth Ekman) writes:
-
- >>spence@cbmvax.commodore.com (Spencer Shanson) writes:
-
- >>>A 1024 x 768 mode would have a refresh rate of 30Hz. Hardly useable!
-
- >>I don't want to agree there...
- >...
-
- >I think I see what you mean... I got a little carried away there.
- >That's 15 Hz without intelace... Unuseable, like you said...
-
- What are you talking about it should be 50hz with interlace, just look at
- the math and the given amount of loss. Might be tough and you will
- have to lower a bit but hardly down to 30hz with interlace. Get a filter
- screen and it should be almost usefull. And should work on a 1960 monitor.
- Should be alright for graphic oriented stuff. I often work in pal interlace.
-
- As soon as I get some docs on 3.0 and can figure out a way to make my own
- monitor type I shall do so. Yet I know it will be a long time until the
- books come out on it and the includes will take a while too.
-
- Martin
-
- --
- I will never buy anything that Bill SATAN LIVES Gates' presently owns.
-