home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!fstop.csc.ti.com!waves.pas.ti.com!macanespie
- From: macanespie@waves.pas.ti.com (Alan MacAnespie)
- Subject: Re: Good news for "Snap" users
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.121757.1@waves.pas.ti.com>
- Lines: 31
- Sender: usenet@csc.ti.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: waves
- Reply-To: macanespie@waves.pas.ti.com
- Organization: Texas Instruments, PAS
- References: <57505@dime.cs.umass.edu> <57533@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:17:57 GMT
-
- In article <57533@dime.cs.umass.edu>, barrett@astro.cs.umass.edu (Daniel Barrett) writes:
- > HOWEVER, the problem that I mentioned in my posting -- snapping
- >text like "Hello" that turns into "HHHHe" --- is gone. So Snap's performance
- >is at least improved in 2.1 (over 2.04).
-
-
- I've been using PowerSnap 2.1 under AmigaOS 2.1. It works perfectly,
- and I have seen no difference in behavior from OS2.04.
-
- What does Snap give you that PowerSnap does not?
-
- Yes, I know that snapping programs might get religious arguments
- similar to which editor is better, but I would like to know if anyone
- has tried both.
-
- (Besides, we all know that these are inferior, and we are just biding
- time until BLAZESNAP(tm) comes out. ;-)
-
- > Dan
- >
- > //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
- >| Dan Barrett -- Dept of Computer Science, Lederle Graduate Research Center |
- >| University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 -- barrett@cs.umass.edu |
- > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////
-
- --
- Alan MacAnespie, || * Standard Disclaimers Apply Upstairs.*
- Texas Instruments, PAS || Is a person who writes many different
- macanespie@waves.pas.ti.com || applications a Renaissance Computist?
-
- How many bits would a BlitBlit blit if a BlitBlit could blit bits?
-