home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!tdat!tools3!swf
- From: swf@tools3teradata.com (Stan Friesen)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Now is the time (Was: Improvements on C++?)
- Message-ID: <1610@tdat.teradata.COM>
- Date: 14 Dec 92 17:25:41 GMT
- References: <5349@holden.lulea.trab.se>
- Sender: news@tdat.teradata.COM
- Distribution: world
- Organization: NCR Teradata Database Business Unit
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <5349@holden.lulea.trab.se>, jbn@lulea.trab.se (Johan Bengtsson) writes:
- |> Is this true? Are you all depending on "default int", you poor sods?
- |> I for one _never_ depend on that rule.
-
- I *used* to. I don't anymore, nowadays I always declare the type of a function.
- (If anything I tend towards a 'default void' style, in C, except I usually even
- declare that).
-
- And, in C++, where all function *must* be declared, I *always* declare the
- return type.
-
- --
- sarima@teradata.com (formerly tdatirv!sarima)
- or
- Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
-