home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.security.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!usenet
- From: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala)
- Subject: Re: CERT and the Dept. of Justice on keystroke monitoring
- In-Reply-To: jd@parcival.nwc.navy.mil (John de la Garrigue)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.222636.29818@nntp.hut.fi>
- Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lusmu.cs.hut.fi
- Reply-To: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala)
- Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
- References: <1992Dec11.164849.3491@nic.csu.net> <Bz9DB1.LHq@avalon.nwc.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:26:36 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <Bz9DB1.LHq@avalon.nwc.navy.mil>, jd@parcival (John de la Garrigue) writes:
- >No, and that's clearly not what the notice is saying. If you work for company X,
- >and use their equipment for whatever reason (notice many companies clearly state
- >*anything* done using their equipment/software/other resources is their
- >property, like it or no), the company has a right to make sure what you are doing
- >is legal and ethical.
-
- The notice didn't say anything about companies, was not targetted at
- companies and has nothing to do with companies. It was for U.S.
- federal agencies.
-
- //Jyrki
-