home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!charnel!rat!koko.csustan.edu!nic.csu.net!nic.csu.net!nntp
- From: oleg@gd.cs.csufresno.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.security.misc
- Subject: Re: CERT and the Dept. of Justice on keystroke monitoring
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.172517.3525@nic.csu.net>
- Date: 15 Dec 92 01:25:16 GMT
- References: <1992Dec11.164849.3491@nic.csu.net> <Bz9DB1.LHq@avalon.nwc.navy.mil>
- Sender: oleg@gd.cs.csufresno.edu
- Organization: Computer Science Departement of California State University in Fresno
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gd.cs.csufresno.edu
-
- In article <Bz9DB1.LHq@avalon.nwc.navy.mil> jd@parcival.nwc.navy.mil writes:
- >In article 3491@nic.csu.net, oleg@gd.cs.csufresno.edu () writes:
- >>In article <q50qgdg@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
- >>>strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:
- >>>
- > <stuff about keystroke monitoring notice deleted>
- >>
- >>Huh? If I work for company X, X automatically has full rights to read
- >>my mail or search my home? Or maybe only if it officially warns me
- >>about this on it's front entrance? :).
- >>
- >>Oleg
- >
- >No, and that's clearly not what the notice is saying. If you work for company X,
- >and use their equipment for whatever reason (notice many companies clearly state
- >*anything* done using their equipment/software/other resources is their
- >property, like it or no), the company has a right to make sure what you are doing
- >is legal and ethical. If you don't like this type of policy, the simple answer
- >is to not use someone else's machine.
- >
-
- Do traceroute to my host and think how fun a life would be if an owner of each
- gateway would capure our packets to ensure that out use of Internet is legal and
- ethical.
-
- Oleg
-
