home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!chalmers.se!news.chalmers.se!dtek.chalmers.se!d9mikael
- From: d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Subject: Re: serial communication question
- Message-ID: <d9mikael.724155527@dtek.chalmers.se>
- Date: 12 Dec 92 10:18:47 GMT
- References: <1992Dec10.053208.12307@ucselx.sdsu.edu> <1992Dec11.044042.26612@vpnet.chi.il.us>
- Sender: news@news.chalmers.se
- Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg Sweden
- Lines: 14
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hacke6.dtek.chalmers.se
-
- hb@vpnet.chi.il.us (hank barta) writes:
-
- >: Can anyone tell me if OS/2 uses interrupt-driven serial
- >: port buffering for COM1 & COM2? I can't find that particular
- >: information anywhere, it seems.
-
- >I believe it does. (Most any multitasker has to use interrupts or
- >_considerable_ hardware buffering.) I also have a deeply held
- >belief that it supports the 16550 buffered UARTs.
-
- Yes, the serial communications device driver in OS/2 certainly uses interrupts
- for its work. It also supports 16550 buffered UARTs.
-
- Mikael Wahlgren
-