home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!ns1.cc.lehigh.edu!lbv2
- From: lbv2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (BRIAN PAUL VAN LIEU)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Subject: Re: Sidekick for PM
- Message-ID: <1992Dec18.144738.42600@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>
- Date: 18 Dec 92 14:47:38 GMT
- Organization: Lehigh University
- Lines: 45
-
-
- In article <1gpkisINNh0b@urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>, leo@abmx.rz.rwth-aach
- en.de writes:
- >Hi everybody,
- >
- >
- >I am using Sidekick 2.0 for DOS. It runs quite well under OS/2,
- >but I was thinking whether there would be an advantage in switching
- >to Sidekick for PM (the old 16-bit version). Some time ago I read
- >some comment in an article that SK for PM was quite bad. I have
- >now a couple of questions:
- >- Is anybody using SK for PM under OS2/ 2.0 ?
- >- Is it any good ?
- >- Will Borland release a 32-bit version ?
- >- Is there any other good Personal Information manager for 2.0 ?
- >
- >I would appreciate any answers.
- >
- >Thanks
- >Karl
- >
- >
- >Karl Leo - Inst. f. Halbleitertechnik - RWTH Aachen
- >
- I too am interested in the differences between the PM version and 2.0 for
- DOS. I wrote once again to Borland about this one. I received a lengthy
- description of the DOS version, but he did not have the PM one on hand.
-
- I believe there is no plans to make a 2.0 version (could call it Sidekick
- for WPS...)
-
- Write and bother them.
-
- customer-service@borland.com
-
- cheers,
-
- bvl
- --
-
- Brian P. Van Lieu
- Lehigh University-AXP
- lbv2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu
-
- OS/2 2.0...anything else is just a DOS.
-