home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.duc.auburn.edu!harriga
- From: harriga@duc.auburn.edu (Greg A. Harris)
- Subject: Re: CKermit - help!
- Message-ID: <harriga.921212210854@lab1.duc.auburn.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.duc.auburn.edu (News Account)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lab1.duc.auburn.edu
- Organization: Auburn University, Alabama
- References: <harriga.921212121303@lab1.duc.auburn.edu> <1992Dec12.202337.16896@ousrvr.oulu.fi>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 03:08:54 GMT
- Lines: 36
-
- In article <1992Dec12.202337.16896@ousrvr.oulu.fi> ojtv@zombie.oulu.fi (Olli Vuolteenaho) writes:
- >and ???? to you: In C-Kermit 179 (and in the MS-kermits I've been using)
- >you actually (c)onnect before you dial (or so I did 2 min ago). Ver 188,
- >however, seems to work differently.
-
- I don't quite understand this. If you connect before you dial, then I assume
- that you do your dialing by using '+++' to send the modem to command mode,
- then issue the ATD. This may not be the best way to connect.
-
-
- >"Dial number" works OK up to point it says CONNECT (baud). Right
- >after the connection is established it bluntly tells "CALL COMPLETE"
- >and hangs up back to the C-kermit prompt. I don't find anything in my
- >ckermit.ini file that should cause this. And like I said in my previous post,
- >the same ini file works fine with the "beta" C-Kermit 179 (which I'm
- >unfortunately still using). What am I doing wrong?
-
- This is exactly what happens when I do a logon. Now that you have the
- "Call complete", you should do the "connect" command c (I do this with
- a script). Your experience is ckermit working as advertised (at least as
- far as I understand ckermit).
-
- To be precise, I do the login thru my script, then the last line in my
- script is "connect".
-
- When you say "hangs back to the C-kermit prompt," this is the point that
- you should do a "connect". Do you mean to say that the modem hangs up?
-
-
- >I'm sorry if my questions are silly. I'm just stuck with old ways of using
- >kermit and I wonder why they've changed it so much between versions 179
- >and 188. Mind you, it may be a change for the better.
-
- I have always done it the same way from 5A(179) thru 5A(188).
-
- --Darrel Hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
-