home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!emr1!jagrant
- From: jagrant@emr1.emr.ca (John Grant)
- Subject: Re: A sane editor to replace PWB ?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec18.221754.23019@emr1.emr.ca>
- Keywords: emacs
- Organization: Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa
- References: <1992Dec16.200318.19835@kth.se> <1992Dec17.183338.7269@kentrox.uucp>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:17:54 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Dec17.183338.7269@kentrox.uucp> kress@kentrox.uucp (Bill Kress) writes:
- >Actually, there are a few features in PWB that can't be replaced easily. The
- >makefile creation is something I've never seen anywhere else, and the source
-
- I'm not sure if this is what you're talking about, but Borland's
- PRJ2MAK can create a makefile from a *.PRJ project file. It's
- very nice.
-
- >browser would be difficult to duplicate. Borland's IDE does the same thing,
- >but not if you're running the Microsoft compilier, and borland isn't quite
- >as flexible.
- >
- >PWB is a pain in the butt to use! If you want something easy use whatever you
-
- Borland's IDE is wonderful, easy to use and runs in Windows!
-
- >usually use just put it in a dos window. If you're a professional programmer
- >buy CodeWright from Premia, it can do almost everything except the Makefiles
- >and Browsing, and can do a lot of other things too.
- >
- >If you're not a professional use borland or maybe Visual Basic :)
-
- I consider myself to be a professional and *I* use Borland.
- I don't really see any particular reason to use MicroSoft C.
- --
- John A. Grant jagrant@emr1.emr.ca
- Airborne Geophysics
- Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa
-