home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!wyatt.ksu.ksu.edu!news
- From: probreak@wyatt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: gcc -g
- Date: 19 Dec 1992 01:52:13 -0600
- Organization: Kansas State University
- Lines: 27
- Message-ID: <1gukbdINNi6h@wyatt.ksu.ksu.edu>
- References: <1992Dec17.232305.24764@watson.ibm.com> <BzGrJH.Jsu@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: wyatt.ksu.ksu.edu
-
- dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Dec17.232305.24764@watson.ibm.com> rajat@watson.ibm.com (Rajat Datta) writes:
- >>I'm running with the basedisk, libdisk, rootdisk, etc. that H.J. Lu
- >>distributes with the GCC package. Where can I find a working libg.a?
- >>Meanwhile, any files I compile with gcc -g fails with segmentation
- >>error; something to do with i/o, I believe, but haven't looked into it
- >>any deeper. Of course, this means gdb is pretty useless too.
- >>
- >>Any ideas? Thanks,
- >>--
- >>rajat (rajat@watson.ibm.com)
-
- >Could the response be posted on c.o.l? I have the same problem.
-
-
- >--
- >===========================================================================
- > phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and
- > ssb1pzp@digex.com | do not reflect the position of any organization"
- >===========================================================================
-
- You can just link libc.a to libg.a and compile with -g just fine. All the
- libg.a stuff had in it before was all the functions compiled with -g.
- This meant you could debug library functions if they broke.
-
- James
-