home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!concert!samba!sunSITE!jem
- From: jem@sunSITE.unc.edu (Jonathan Magid)
- Subject: Re: MONEY + Linux
- Message-ID: <1992Dec17.195753.29891@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sunsite.unc.edu
- Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- References: <1992Dec17.033917.2963@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 19:57:53 GMT
- Lines: 70
-
- In article <1992Dec17.033917.2963@midway.uchicago.edu> goer@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >Can Linux go on forever without some commercial support?
-
- Who knows... This sort of thing is fairly new (commodity hardware with free
- operating system: there have been free OS's before but they didn't run on
- machines that one can get from a zillion odd (some *very* odd :) )
- manufacturers)
-
- I mean,
- >it's hard to see anything as useful that's maintained by folks that
- >aren't doing it for a living - at least the size of a 386 UNIX
- >implementation.
-
- hmmm. I beg to differ. the net has a history of "picking up" the
- maintenance of useful things that have been abandoned.
-
- >Is there some way that a useful remuneration path
- >can be arranged.
-
- sure: the free market. :)
-
- >E.g. could universities be site-licensed, thereby
- >gaining the right to have attention paid to their bugs and config-
- >uration problems, and to receive regular updates?
- >
- You see, Linux (the kernel and most of the main utilities including
- the compiler are copy-lefted. Anyone can give them away or sell them...
- So anysort of site licence based on updates will quickly be undermined
- by people just giving it away.
-
- Custom features and immediate bug fixes though, do have some potential.
- Ask (who was it?) the fellow who wrote the Xenix emulator for Linux under
- contract or actually ask anybody at cygnus.com who does that sort of thing
- for a living.
-
- >This might seem to come out of the blue to people on this list, but
- >many, many people won't touch Linux because they don't see it as
- >"going anywhere" except into an endless chain of mixed expert and
- >amateurish accretions that can't possibly be maintained properly.
-
- hmm. if you want a serious conversation, I reccomend not accusing people
- who have probably together put some thousands of man (and woman) hours
- into the development, testing and organization of Linux of "amateurish
- accretions". It just ain't polite. 1/2 :)
-
- Linus is our benevolent dictator kernel-wise. Out of respect for
- his work and contribution to the good of the universe, people have not
- been calling things "Linux" unless its his official kernel release.
-
- What Linus says is Linux, is Linux; he has been the channel for approving
- new, contributed kernel patches and features. This has prevented what you
- fear. Well, not exactly. All of Linus' work is by its nature, amateur.
-
- He is an amateur (i.e. not doing this for a living) as are most contributers
- to Linux. Which is why you should read the section on "polite" twice.
-
- Read the GPL (the file COPYING in the kernel source). it is the license that
- Linux is distributed under. If you think such a service as you propose is
- needed and you can make money on it (or you just want to be another amateur!)
- go to it.
-
- best of luck,
- jem.
-
-
-
- --
- Jonathan Magid jem@sunSITE.unc.edu sunSITE Administrator
- Virtual pizza Delivery (tm)::faxed in 30 cycles or less or you get it
- ----------------------------------------FREE!!!-----------------------
-