home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!hydra!klaava!laakkone
- From: laakkone@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tero Laakkonen)
- Subject: Re: Old Binaries' Summary
- Message-ID: <1992Dec16.174038.17732@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
- Organization: University of Helsinki
- References: <1992Dec15.182831.11602@klaava.Helsinki.FI> <1992Dec16.161156.14238@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:40:38 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In <1992Dec16.161156.14238@klaava.Helsinki.FI> laakkone@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tero Laakkonen) writes:
-
-
- >>binary acquisition date fault
- >>====== ================ =====
-
- >>setterm ~ 92.07.10 stat()
- ~ Linux 0.97 stat()
- >>tcsh ~ 92.07.10 stat()
- >mtools - mcd ~ 92.07.10 core dump (?)
- >emacs ~ 92.07.10 stat()
- >man (*) ~ 92.07.10 stat()
- groff ~ 92.07.10 stat()
- >bash ~ Linux 0.97 getwd()
- >make ~ Linux 0.97 getwd()
- >less ~ Linux 0.97 stat()
-
-
- >(*) perhaps this is a problem with a binary that man execs, possibly
- >'less'. i don't know yet...
-
- no, it doesn't seem to a 'less' problem. but last i checked my 'groff'
- binary uses the old stat() call too, and i understand 'man' execs
- groff...?
-
- well, at least my old kermit binary isn't broken! i'm
- sending this from a kermit session...
-
- -tero
-