home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!halifax-ts2-9.nstn.ns.ca!jmaclean
- From: jmaclean@fox.nstn.ns.ca (James MacLean)
- Subject: Re: Prob: ELM from SLS.98p[56] = no password entry ?
- Message-ID: <jmaclean.5.724424861@fox.nstn.ns.ca>
- Keywords: ELM PASSWORD PASSWD
- Lines: 20
- Sender: usenet@nstn.ns.ca (NNTP Entity)
- Organization: Department of Education, Nova Scotia, Canada
- References: <acornwal.3.724365490@fox.nstn.ns.ca>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:07:41 GMT
-
- In article <acornwal.3.724365490@fox.nstn.ns.ca> acornwal@fox.nstn.ns.ca (James MacLean) writes:
- >From: acornwal@fox.nstn.ns.ca (James MacLean)
- >Subject: Prob: ELM from SLS.98p[56] = no password entry ?
- >Keywords: ELM PASSWORD PASSWD
- >Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:38:10 GMT
- >ELM was working fine for me with 98p5 + Image from 98.6 but now that I have
- >added some more of the additional 98.6 benefits (shadow passwords,etc...),
- >ELM states that there is no password entry for every user except ROOT. What
- >gives?
- >
- >JES
- I have found that I could fix my problem by giving general read access to the
- passwd file. Wrong way I imagine, but it worked. I looked for some docs on
- this shadow securetty but have not come up with anything, where should I look
- to get the low down?
- JES
- James MacLean
- Department of Education
- N.S., CAN.
-
-