home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!dsinc!dsinc!not-for-mail
- From: syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein)
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Subject: Re: Status for messages handled by filter
- Date: 11 Dec 1992 22:17:53 -0500
- Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA
- Lines: 23
- Message-ID: <1gbll1INNc1n@dsinc.dsi.com>
- References: <1992Dec12.002246.21026@netcom.com>
- Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dsinc.dsi.com
-
- ekman@netcom.com (Crossly the Glad-Eyed Bear) writes:
-
- >We're using Elm 2.3 PL11 here. I use filter to sort my mail into
- >various subdirectories under my login directory. It works ok except for
- >one thing:
-
- >None of the messages show an "N" status when I go to read them with elm.
- >I initially thought that filter might be inserting a "Status: RO" line
- >into them, but it doesn't. All I can conclude is that elm assumes that
- >anything not in my primary mailbox must be old, even if I've never read
- >it, but only had it put elsewhere by filter.
-
- >Is there some way to get the message status to show properly for mail
- >handled by filter?
-
- Elm consideres any mail not in the spool, never new. If you want to
- change that, delete the if clause from the source that checks to see
- if its a spool before displaying the N status flag.
- --
- ========================================================================
- Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP Elm Coordinator - Current 2.4PL13
- Datacomp Systems, Inc. Projected 3.0 Release: ??? ?,1994
- syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd Voice: (215) 947-9900, FAX: (215) 938-0235
-