home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!thinman
- From: thinman@netcom.com (Technically Sweet)
- Subject: Re: Are interpreters now as fast as compiled code used to be?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec17.182039.26555@netcom.com>
- Organization: International Foundation for Internal Freedom
- References: <1992Dec15.201735.21731@netcom.com> <GJR.92Dec15214517@klosters.ai.mit.edu> <1992Dec16.190713.20460@netcom.com> <1gocpvINN3i8@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:20:39 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Harvey) writes:
-
- >Implementation inefficiency isn't the only problem with continuations. The
- >other problem is that nobody understands them.
-
- OK, ok, Dylan needs some sort of thread system. Opinion: it should be
- friendly to transparent multi-processor operation.
-
-
- --
-
- Lance Norskog
-
- Data is not information is not knowledge is not wisdom.
-